Yup, still here, still pregnant. I was woken by contractions at about 5 this morning, which didn’t go away until I got up a little after 6. Once I got up they stopped though, leaving behind a sort of unsettled crampy sort of feeling. *sigh* I keep reminding myself that I’m still not as far along as I was when I had Gregory (after all, he was a week late). I measured 39 cm at my appointment on Tuesday, which means the baby has dropped a fair amount. This is definitely a good sign. If I end up going to my 41 week appointment on Tuesday, then we’ll start talking about natural induction methods. Thankfully they do not recommend castor oil for a third pregnancy!
On a different subject entirely - I’ve been reading the Laura Ingalls Wilder books to Emma (and Gregory, he seems to like them too), and my take on them is quite different now than when I was a child. When I first read them, I was taken away by the adventure of it all and the differences between my life and Laura’s. I still find the differences remarkable, but now I’m looking more at Ma than Laura. How she manages to run a household in such isolated and primitive conditions completely amazes me. What I have been ruminating on the most recently though is the limited nature of their diet. I don’t think they eat any fruits and vegetables other than plums, prunes, and turnips during the entire books of Little House on the Prairie and On the Banks of Plum Creek (a time span of over 3 years, if I’m figuring correctly). Their diet consists of cornbread, wild game, fish, bread, butter, eggs and milk in varying amounts depending on season and circumstances. I have a hard time understanding how this is even possible! They try to plant gardens at a couple different points, but one had to be abandoned, and the other was eaten by grasshoppers. I have to wonder - was their diet really that poor, or is this just a fault of Wilder’s memory?